My “Knowmads” podcast on science and AI

Or click here if the above doesn’t work.

Recorded in-person in my office at UT Austin, with a bulleted list containing “ARC,” “Scalable Oversight,” and “Models” behind me on my blackboard for some reason (I no longer remember who put those there or why). 90 minutes long. Sometimes you see my disembodied arm waving in midair because of the way the cameras are combined. As always, I strongly recommend 2x speed for the correct experience.

This might actually be one of my best podcasts ever, although I wasn’t planning on that! Thanks so much to Bhavay Tyagi and Prachi Garella for driving all the way from Houston to record it.

Here’s a strict subset of the topics we covered:

  • The story of AI models solving the Navier-Stokes Millennium Problem, insofar as it’s known
  • Can recent AI proofs be called “truly creative”?
  • The history of AI before the LLM revolution
  • What do we mean when we call LLMs “black boxes”?
  • The achievements of the field of interpretability
  • What exactly happened in the OpenAI/HuggingFace incident
  • Must we avoid all “anthropomorphizing language” when discussing the HuggingFace incident? (spoiler alert: no)
  • Examples of major open problems in quantum computing theory that I cared about for decades and that AI models have recently solved
  • Effects of the current AI cataclysm on the math community, especially students
  • What annoys me the most when I listen to AI talks
  • My experiences at OpenAI, why they hired me, and the watermarking work that I did there

Enjoy!

More AI-related content coming soon, as this blog—like much of the rest of the world—continues its transition to “all AI, all the time” (except still 100% written by an aging, deteriorating biological brain)

One Response to “My “Knowmads” podcast on science and AI”

  1. Brandon Enright Says:

    AI is the biggest thing to happen in a long time, and whether I want it or not, I feel like a significant portion of my own thinking time involves AI in some way. So not only does a focus on AI topics on your blog make sense, I especially appreciate reading your thoughts and insights on the matter.

    Well that, and QC 🙂

Leave a Reply

You can use rich HTML in comments! You can also use basic TeX, by enclosing it within $$ $$ for displayed equations or \( \) for inline equations.

Comment Policies:

After two decades of mostly-open comments, in July 2024 Shtetl-Optimized transitioned to the following policy:

All comments are treated, by default, as personal missives to me, Scott Aaronson---with no expectation either that they'll appear on the blog or that I'll reply to them.

At my leisure and discretion, and in consultation with the Shtetl-Optimized Committee of Guardians, I'll put on the blog a curated selection of comments that I judge to be particularly interesting or to move the topic forward, and I'll do my best to answer those. But it will be more like Letters to the Editor. Anyone who feels unjustly censored is welcome to the rest of the Internet.

To the many who've asked me for this over the years, you're welcome!