{"id":5371,"date":"2021-03-07T13:15:53","date_gmt":"2021-03-07T19:15:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/?p=5371"},"modified":"2021-03-07T13:15:53","modified_gmt":"2021-03-07T19:15:53","slug":"another-axe-swung-at-the-sycamore","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/?p=5371","title":{"rendered":"Another axe swung at the Sycamore"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">So there&#8217;s an interesting new paper on the arXiv by Feng Pan and Pan Zhang, entitled <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/2103.03074\">&#8220;Simulating the Sycamore supremacy circuits.&#8221;<\/a>  It&#8217;s about a new tensor contraction strategy for classically simulating Google&#8217;s 53-qubit quantum supremacy experiment from Fall 2019.  Using their approach, and using just 60 GPUs running for a few days, the authors say they managed to generate a million <em>correlated<\/em> 53-bit strings&#8212;meaning, strings that all agree on a specific subset of 20 or so bits&#8212;that achieve a high linear cross-entropy score.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Alas, I haven&#8217;t had time this weekend to write a &#8220;proper&#8221; blog post about this, but several people have by now emailed to ask my opinion, so I thought I&#8217;d share the brief response I sent to a journalist.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">This does look like a significant advance on simulating Sycamore-like random quantum circuits!  Since it&#8217;s based on tensor networks, you don&#8217;t need the literally largest supercomputer on the planet filling up tens of petabytes of hard disk space with amplitudes, as in the brute-force strategy <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/abs\/1910.09534\">proposed by IBM<\/a>.  Pan and Zhang&#8217;s strategy seems most similar to the strategy previously <a href=\"https:\/\/arxiv.org\/pdf\/2005.06787.pdf\">proposed by Alibaba<\/a>, with the key difference being that the new approach generates millions of correlated samples rather than just one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">I guess my main thoughts for now are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol class=\"wp-block-list\"><li>Once you knew about this particular attack, you could evade it and get back to where we were before by switching to a more sophisticated verification test \u2014 namely, one where you not only computed a Linear XEB score for the observed samples, you <em>also<\/em> made sure that the samples didn\u2019t share too many bits in common. \u00a0(Strangely, though, the paper never mentions this point.)<\/li><li>The other response, of course, would just be to redo random circuit sampling with a slightly bigger quantum computer, like the ~70-qubit devices that Google, IBM, and others are now building!<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"wp-block-paragraph\">Anyway, very happy for thoughts from anyone who knows more.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>So there&#8217;s an interesting new paper on the arXiv by Feng Pan and Pan Zhang, entitled &#8220;Simulating the Sycamore supremacy circuits.&#8221; It&#8217;s about a new tensor contraction strategy for classically simulating Google&#8217;s 53-qubit quantum supremacy experiment from Fall 2019. Using their approach, and using just 60 GPUs running for a few days, the authors say [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"{title}\n\n{excerpt}\n\n{url}","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[5,4],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5371","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-complexity","category-quantum"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5371","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5371"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5371\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5372,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5371\/revisions\/5372"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5371"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5371"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5371"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}