{"id":3608,"date":"2017-12-31T21:32:05","date_gmt":"2018-01-01T03:32:05","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/?p=3608"},"modified":"2018-01-06T20:06:39","modified_gmt":"2018-01-07T02:06:39","slug":"should-i-join-heterodox-academy","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/?p=3608","title":{"rendered":"Should I join Heterodox Academy?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Happy new year, everyone!<\/p>\n<p>An anonymous commenter wrote:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Scott, you seem to admire Steven Pinker, you had problems with SJW attacks for your now famous comment 171 and, if I remember well, you said you have some \u201cheterodox\u201d ideas that you think it\u2019s dangerous to make public.\u00a0 [Actually, I&#8217;m not sure I ever said that&#8212;indeed, if it were true, why <em>would<\/em> I say it? \ud83d\ude42 &#8211;SA ]\u00a0 Why aren\u2019t you in the Heterodox Academy? Didn\u2019t you know about it?<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">Heterodox Academy is an organisation of professors, adjunct professors, post-docs and graduate students who are for freedom of speech, founded by Steven Pinker, Jonathan Haidt and a few other academics, and now has over 1000 members.<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><a href=\"https:\/\/heterodoxacademy.org\/\" rel=\"nofollow\">https:\/\/heterodoxacademy.org<\/a><\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\">(I\u2019m not a member, because I\u2019m not an academic or graduate student, but I sympathize very much with their fight to protect freedom of thought.)<\/p>\n<p>By coincidence, just last week I was looking at the Heterodox Academy website, and thinking about joining.\u00a0 But then I got put off by the <a href=\"https:\/\/heterodoxacademy.org\/join\/academicmembership\/\">&#8220;pledge&#8221;<\/a> for new members:<\/p>\n<p style=\"padding-left: 30px;\"><i>\u201cI believe that university life requires that people with diverse viewpoints and perspectives encounter each other in an environment where they feel free to speak up and challenge each other. I am concerned that many academic fields and universities currently lack sufficient viewpoint diversity\u2014particularly political diversity. I will support viewpoint diversity in my academic field, my university, my department, and my classroom.\u201d<\/i><\/p>\n<p>For some reason, I&#8217;m allergic to joining any organization that involves a pledge, <strong>even if<\/strong> it&#8217;s a pledge that I completely agree with.\u00a0 And in this case, maybe the issue goes a bit deeper.\u00a0 My central concern, with university life, is that academics share a baseline commitment to <em>Enlightenment norms and values<\/em>: e.g., to freedom of speech, reason, empiricism, and judging arguments by their merits rather than by the speaker&#8217;s identity.\u00a0 These are the norms that I&#8217;d say enabled the scientific revolution, and that are still the fundamental preconditions for intellectual inquiry.<\/p>\n<p>A diversity of viewpoints is often a good <em>diagnostic<\/em> for Enlightenment norms, but it&#8217;s not the central issue, and is neither necessary nor sufficient.\u00a0 For example, I don&#8217;t care if academia lacks &#8220;viewpoint diversity&#8221; in the UFO, creationism, or birther debates.\u00a0 Nor do I care if the spectrum of ideas that gets debated in academia is radically different from the spectrum debated in the wider society.\u00a0 Indeed, I don&#8217;t even know that it&#8217;s mathematically possible to satisfy everyone on that count: for example, a representative sampling of American political opinions might strike a European, or a Bay Area resident, as bizarrely clustered in one or two corners of idea-space, and the reverse might be equally true.<\/p>\n<p>More pointedly&#8212;and bear with me as I invent a bizarre hypothetical&#8212;if some sort of delusional, autocratic thug managed to take control of the United States: someone who promoted unhinged conspiracy theories; whose whole worldview were based on the overwhelming of facts, reason, reality, and even linguistic coherence by raw strength and emotion; whose every word and deed were diametrically opposed to any conceivable vision of the mission of a university&#8212;in such an extreme case, I&#8217;d hope that American academia would speak with one voice against the enveloping darkness, just as I would&#8217;ve hoped German academia would speak with one voice in 1933 (it didn&#8217;t).\u00a0 When Enlightenment norms themselves are under assault, those norms are consistent with a unified response.<\/p>\n<p>Having said that, I&#8217;m certainly also worried about the erosion of Enlightenment norms <em>within<\/em>\u00a0academia, or specific parts of academia: the speakers shouted down rather than debated, the classrooms taken over, the dogmatic postmodernism and blank-slatism, all the stuff Jonathan Haidt reviews in <a href=\"https:\/\/www.city-journal.org\/html\/age-outrage-15608.html\">this article<\/a>.\u00a0 This is a development for which the left, not the right, bears primary responsibility.\u00a0 I view it as a huge unearned gift that the &#8220;good guys&#8221; give the &#8220;bad guys.&#8221;\u00a0 It provides them endless outrage-fodder.\u00a0 It stokes their paranoid fantasies while also\u00a0making us look foolish.\u00a0 And it lets them call us hypocrites, whose prattle about science and reason and free inquiry has been conclusively unmasked.\u00a0 So if Heterodox Academy is making headway against the illiberal wing of liberalism, that <em>does<\/em> seem like something I should support, regardless of any differences in emphasis.<\/p>\n<p>Readers: what do you think?\u00a0 In the comments, give me your best argument for why I should or shouldn&#8217;t join Heterodox Academy.\u00a0 Feel free to call my attention to anything the organization has been up to; my research has been less than comprehensive.\u00a0 I&#8217;ll credit the most convincing argument(s) when I make a decision.\u00a0 Like, not that it&#8217;s especially consequential either way, but if commenters here are going to argue anyway, we might as well make something actually hinge on it&#8230;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Happy new year, everyone! An anonymous commenter wrote: Scott, you seem to admire Steven Pinker, you had problems with SJW attacks for your now famous comment 171 and, if I remember well, you said you have some \u201cheterodox\u201d ideas that you think it\u2019s dangerous to make public.\u00a0 [Actually, I&#8217;m not sure I ever said that&#8212;indeed, [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"advanced_seo_description":"","jetpack_seo_html_title":"","jetpack_seo_noindex":false,"jetpack_seo_schema_type":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"{title}\n\n{excerpt}\n\n{url}","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"_wpas_customize_per_network":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[11,7],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3608","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-nerd-interest","category-self-referential"],"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3608","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=3608"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3608\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3612,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3608\/revisions\/3612"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=3608"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=3608"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/scottaaronson.blog\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=3608"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}